Iranians’ moral is one of the issues researched in recent decades. However, it has been studied with a binary approach in all studies. In this article, we have tried to show that the Iranians’ moral is fuzzy and cannot be addressed with a binary approach. Therefore, in this study, we tried to use a fuzzy approach to deal with the Iranians’ morals in Reggie contract. The results of the study showed that in the Reggie incident, people gained membership scores in charactristics such as collectivism,anti authoritarianismand anarchism. In the case of collectivism, people gained a fuzzy membership score of 0.92 due to their participation in protesting against the Reggie contract, in the case of anti-authoritarianism, people gained a fuzzy membership score of 0.81 due to struggling until achieving the goal, and in the case of anarchism, people gained a fuzzy membership score of 0.06 due to threating the lives of Muslims and foreigners. Based on the obtained results, it can be said that the fuzzy approach to the Iranians’ morals can give more appropriate results than the binary approach
Ghasemi, A., Mehdizadeh, S., & Bastani, S. (2021). A Study on Iranians’ Morals in Reggie Contract (An Investigation of Collectivism, Anti-Authoritarianism and Anarchism). Sociology of Social Institutions, 7(16), 217-249. doi: 10.22080/ssi.2021.3139
MLA
Afsaneh Ghasemi; Sharareh Mehdizadeh; Susan Bastani. "A Study on Iranians’ Morals in Reggie Contract (An Investigation of Collectivism, Anti-Authoritarianism and Anarchism)". Sociology of Social Institutions, 7, 16, 2021, 217-249. doi: 10.22080/ssi.2021.3139
HARVARD
Ghasemi, A., Mehdizadeh, S., Bastani, S. (2021). 'A Study on Iranians’ Morals in Reggie Contract (An Investigation of Collectivism, Anti-Authoritarianism and Anarchism)', Sociology of Social Institutions, 7(16), pp. 217-249. doi: 10.22080/ssi.2021.3139
VANCOUVER
Ghasemi, A., Mehdizadeh, S., Bastani, S. A Study on Iranians’ Morals in Reggie Contract (An Investigation of Collectivism, Anti-Authoritarianism and Anarchism). Sociology of Social Institutions, 2021; 7(16): 217-249. doi: 10.22080/ssi.2021.3139